Skip to content
TriedPrompts

Compare first-time Medicare options with Gemini alongside a human advisor

Posted
by Jeff Hall (Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Curmudgeon)
Last checked
Method:
How we verify

Evidence: Described by posterThe person describes what happened in words, without screenshots or video.

Outcome

Facing a first Medicare sign-up, Jeff Hall used AI (Hall calls it Gemini Notebook) to work out which options to choose, alongside an advisor from LeClair Group. The goal was to minimize out-of-pocket costs. Running simulations on the shortlist, Hall found the options 'almost net out the same or within a few hundred dollars of each other', and the results came out entirely different for Hall's spouse. Hall's takeaway: Medicare plans are like a balloon, and anyone who tries this alone 'is a fool'. The post doesn't say which plan Hall picked.

AI tool

Gemini

Prompt Recreated prompt

The source didn't share its exact prompt, so we wrote this from what it describes.

What the prompt labels mean

We're signing up for Medicare for the first time. Here's our shortlist of options and our usual medical costs. Simulate what each option would cost us out of pocket in a year, separately for me and my spouse, and tell me how they compare.

Try this in:

Sends the Recreated prompt shown above. ChatGPT and Grok open with it filled in, and ChatGPT may send it straight away. Gemini opens empty, so we copy the prompt for you to paste. Every button also copies it.

Opens in a new tab. We don't see what you send.

These links are only a shortcut. We're not affiliated with OpenAI, Google or xAI, and your results may not match the source.

Optional stronger version

Our rewrite with extra checks. The poster didn't test it.

Before you start, ask me 1–3 short questions about the details below and wait for my answers. Once I've answered, confirm the plan in one line and run the whole task start to finish.

Goal: Compare my shortlisted Medicare options by likely yearly out-of-pocket cost, so I can discuss them with my advisor.

Questions to ask me first:
- Which plans or plan types are on the shortlist, and for whom (me, my spouse, both)?
- What are our usual doctors, prescriptions and expected care this year?
- Is anything more important to us than cost (keeping a doctor, travel, dental)?

Inputs (fill in or confirm):
- Shortlist with each plan's premium, deductible, copays and out-of-pocket maximum, copied from the official plan documents: [PLAN DETAILS]
- Our prescriptions and doses: [PRESCRIPTIONS]
- Our doctors: [DOCTORS]
- Expected care this year: [VISITS AND PROCEDURES]

Rules:
- Use only the plan figures I give you or that you can show from an official plan document; never fill gaps with guesses.
- Work out each person separately, then the household total.
- Show a low-use, typical-use and high-use year for each plan.
- Flag anything you can't check, like whether a doctor is in network or a drug is covered.
- Don't recommend a plan; lay out the trade-offs for me and my advisor.

Checkpoint: Show me the plan details table before you run the numbers, so I can correct anything.

If you get stuck: If a plan's numbers are missing or unclear, list exactly what I need to look up instead of estimating.

Verify before you finish: Recalculate each total once and check that no plan's out-of-pocket cost exceeds its stated maximum.

Output: A comparison table per person and for the household, plus a short list of questions to ask my advisor.

Done when: I can see how the options compare in a bad year and a normal year, and know what to confirm with my advisor.

Source

https://jeffhallinmn.substack.com/p/why-is-medicare-so-damn-complicated

  • Dan Taylor-Watt gave Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini the same brief, with deep research turned on, to research a paternal grandfather, Cecil, who died in 1960, starting from a Word document written by Taylor-Watt's father. Claude took about 6 minutes, used 340 sources and wrote an 11-page, 4,219-word report; it found no significant new information but flagged inaccurate dates, and it later made a 3-minute-30-second narrated video using code and an open-source voice model. ChatGPT took 9 minutes, ran 714 searches and wrote 14 pages (4,659 words); it caught an error about the year of the fire that destroyed service records, noted that the LNER railway wasn't created until 1923, found information on the first wife's family, and spotted a Lance-Corporal's chevron in a photo, but its video attempt fell short. Gemini wrote the longest and most visual report (5,347 words), but its maps were wrong (Osmotherley is east, not south, of Northallerton), it missed the date problems, and it said it couldn't make a video.

    Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini · Personal · Source date:

  • Ali Salman Zia asked Gemini about four Pixel annoyances instead of searching for each. For battery drain, it walked through battery usage, flagged a power-hungry background app and suggested changing that app's settings; the improvement was modest but noticeable. For too many notifications, it pointed to Notification History and each app's notification categories, so Zia switched off only the ones not needed. For full storage, it explained which apps and files took the most space and which were safe to remove, and Zia freed a lot of space without deleting anything important. For a connection that kept switching between Wi-Fi and mobile data, it helped narrow down the cause first; turning off Adaptive connectivity and automatic switching to mobile data fixed it.

    Gemini · Personal · Source date:

  • Charlie fed months of emails, texts and call logs about a 28-week roof leak with a corporate landlord into Gemini. It mapped out the timeline and helped draft the emails to close the case, and the structured summary let Charlie's rental agent take it straight up the chain of command for approval. Charlie says it took 20 minutes and saved $6,235; the post doesn't break that figure down.

    Gemini · Personal · Source date: